Prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 15 (1) , 56-67
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04329.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Appropriate use of drugs to prevent thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) involves comparing the patient’s risk of stroke and risk of hemorrhage. This review summarizes the evidence regarding the efficacy of these medications. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of drugs used to prevent thromboembolism in adults with nonpostoperative AF. Articles were identified through the Cochrane Collaboration’s CENTRAL database and MEDLINE until May 1998. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven articles met criteria for inclusion in this review. Warfarin was more efficacious than placebo for primary stroke prevention (aggregate odds ratio [OR] of stroke =0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19, 0.48), with moderate evidence of more major bleeding (OR 1.90; 95% CI 0.89, 4.04). Aspirin was inconclusively more efficacious than placebo for stroke prevention (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.19, 1.65), with inconclusive evidence regarding more major bleeds (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.37, 1.77). For primary prevention, assuming a baseline risk of 45 strokes per 1,000 patient-years, warfarin could prevent 30 strokes at the expense of only 6 additional major bleeds. Aspirin could prevent 17 strokes, without increasing major hemorrhage. In direct comparison, there was evidence suggesting fewer strokes among patients on warfarin than among patients on aspirin (aggregate OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43, 0.96), with only suggestive evidence for more major hemorrhage (OR 1.60, 95% CI 0.77, 3.35). However, in younger patients, with a mean age of 65 years, the absolute reduction in stroke rate with warfarin compared with aspirin was low (5.5 per 1,000 person-years) compared with an older group (15 per 1,000 person-years). CONCLUSION: In general, the evidence strongly supports warfarin for patients with AF at average or greater risk of stroke. Aspirin may prove to be useful in subgroups with a low risk of stroke, although this is not definitively supported by the evidence.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indobufen Versus Warfarin in the Secondary Prevention of Major Vascular Events in Nonrheumatic Atrial FibrillationStroke, 1997
- Anticoagulant therapy in patients aged 80 years or more with atrial fibrillation. More caution is neededArchives of Family Medicine, 1997
- Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Chronic Atrial FibrillationStroke, 1997
- Optimal Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation and Recent Cerebral IschemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study*1The Lancet, 1994
- Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor strokeThe Lancet, 1993
- Warfarin in the Prevention of Stroke Associated with Nonrheumatic Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Canadian atrial fibrillation anticoaguiation (CAFA) studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981