Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
Open Access
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 14 (10) , 622-624
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.09058.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?JAMA, 1998
- Peer ReviewJAMA, 1994
- Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensablePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1990
- Peer Review in Medical JournalsChest, 1987
- Some ethical issues among editors, reviewers and readersJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- The decision to publish. Ethical dilemmasJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Righting Medical WritingPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1985
- Peer review again.American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- Peer review in biomedical publicationThe American Journal of Medicine, 1974