Prophylactic Subcutaneous Heparin does not Increase Operative Blood Loss in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 62 (3) , 246-248
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb04327.x
Abstract
Summary— A prospective randomised study of subcutaneous heparin compared with no heparin was performed in 60 patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Operative blood loss in the irrigation fluid was measured using a haemoglobinometer. Blood loss correlated with the amount of prostate resected and the duration of the procedure. Subcutaneous heparin had no significant effect on the measured blood loss in transurethral resection of the prostate and can be used as a safe means of prophylaxis against thrombo-embolic complications.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protection against thrombo-embolismBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Determination of Blood Loss During Transurethral Prostatic ResectionScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1984
- Minidose heparin in transurethralprostatectomyUrology, 1983
- Deep vein thrombosis and prostatectomyUrology, 1983
- The Effect of Prophylactic Subcutaneous Heparin on Blood Loss During and After Transurethral ProstatectomyBritish Journal of Urology, 1982
- The Use of Prophylactic Low Dose Heparin in Transurethral ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1978
- Surgical haemorrhage in patients given subcutaneous heparin as prophylaxis against thromboembolism.BMJ, 1978
- Anticoagulation in urologic surgeryUrology, 1977
- Blood Loss During Transurethral ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1969