Comparison of iohexol-240 versus iohexol-300 in abdominal CT
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Abdominal Radiology
- Vol. 17 (1) , 122-124
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01888525
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agentsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1989
- A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effectsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1989
- CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancementAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1989
- The RACR Survey of Intravenous Contrast Media Reactions Final ReportAustralasian Radiology, 1988
- Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?Radiology, 1988
- The Introduction of Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents in RadiologyJAMA, 1988
- Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environmentAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1988
- Contrast Agent Enhancement in Abdominal Computed Tomography Ionic vs. Nonionic AgentsInvestigative Radiology, 1984
- Computed Body Tomography with IopamidolInvestigative Radiology, 1984
- Angiographic contrast agents: conventional and new media comparedAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982