An empirical comparison of two subject-specific approaches to dominant heights modeling: The dummy variable method and the mixed model method
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Forest Ecology and Management
- Vol. 255 (7) , 2659-2669
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.030
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A generalized height–diameter model including random components for radiata pine plantations in northwestern SpainForest Ecology and Management, 2006
- Modeling dominant height growth of radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations in north-western SpainForest Ecology and Management, 2005
- Analysis of variance—why it is more important than everThe Annals of Statistics, 2005
- Modeling dominant height growth based on nonlinear mixed-effects model: a clonal Eucalyptus plantation case studyForest Ecology and Management, 2005
- Construction of site index equations for Pinus sylvestris L. using permanent plot data in SwedenForest Ecology and Management, 1997
- Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling of Cumulative Bole Volume with Spatially Correlated Within-Tree DataJournal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 1996
- Estimating coefficients of base-age-invariant site index equationsCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1993
- A Stochastic Differential Equation Model for the Height Growth of Forest StandsPublished by JSTOR ,1983
- Specification Tests in EconometricsEconometrica, 1978
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974