Physician-Payment Reform — Unfinished Business
Open Access
- 14 May 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 326 (20) , 1330-1334
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199205143262005
Abstract
WITH the final implementation of the Medicare fee schedule in January of this year, the renegotiation of a political bargain first struck more than 25 years ago was successfully concluded. To secure a reluctant profession's cooperation with Medicare, Congress promised in 1965 that it would refrain from exercising "any supervision or control over the practice of medicine or the manner in which medical services are provided, or over the selection, tenure or compensation of any officer or employee of any institution, agency or person providing health services."1 During the past decade, this laissez-faire posture proved economically untenable. It was abandoned conclusively when, with the profession's support, Congress passed the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1989,2 which put in place the framework of the recently implemented physician-payment reform.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who Cares for Uninsured Persons?Medical Care, 1991
- The Outcomes Movement — Will It Get Us Where We Want to Go?New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Do Practice Guidelines Guide Practice?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Results, potential effects, and implementation issues of the Resource-Based Relative Value ScalePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- The Use of Ambulatory Testing in Prepaid and Fee-for-Service Group PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The Role of the Primary Physician in the Health-Care IndustryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Effects of financial incentives on physicians' specialty and location decisionsHealth Policy and Education, 1980