Detection and Significance of Microscopic Hematuria in Patients with Blunt Renal Trauma
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 140 (1) , 16-18
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41472-8
Abstract
Detection of hematuria is paramount in establishing injury to the urinary system. In 339 patients with blunt renal trauma in whom radiographic studies defined the severity of injury we compared the degree of microscopic hematuria determined by dipstick and microscopic urinalysis. The overall correlation between the 2 methods was low (Pearson''s coefficient 0.41). However, more than 80 per cent of the urine samples with 50 to 100 red blood cells per high power field corresponded to a dipstick result of 3+. The dipstick method had greater than 97.5 per cent sensitivity and specificity for detection of microscopic hematuria. Only 7 of the 339 patients (< 2%) had a discharge diagnosis of other than renal contusion: 5 had renal artery thrombosis or avulsion of the renal vessels and 2 had minor cortical lacerations that were managed nonoperatively. Although microscopic hematuria may be quantified more accurately by microscopic analysis, it can be detected reliably with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity by dipstick analysis.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergency Intravenous Pyelography in the Trauma PatientArchives of Surgery, 1985
- Are urine dipsticks reliable indicators of hematuria in blunt trauma patients?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- Hematuria after Blunt TraumaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1983
- Hemoglobinuria and hematuria: accuracy and precision of laboratory diagnosis.Clinical Chemistry, 1979
- Significance of Hematuria After TraumaJournal of Urology, 1978
- Urinalysis by use of multi-test reagent strips: two dipsticks compared.Clinical Chemistry, 1977
- Renal TraumaJournal of Urology, 1977