Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters
Open Access
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 70 (2) , 363-370
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1994.307
Abstract
Differences in survival outcome for patients with ovarian cancer in Scotland led to an investigation of whether these differences were due to variation in presenting prognostic features or to the organisation and delivery of cancer services. A retrospective study of all 533 cases of ovarian cancer registered in Scotland in 1987 was carried out. After adjustment for age, stage, pathology, degree of differentiation and presence of ascites, survival improved when patients (1) were first seen by a gynaecologist (P < 0.05); (2) were operated on by a gynaecologist (P < 0.05); (3) had residual disease of less than 2 cm post-operatively (P < 0.001); (4) were prescribed platinum chemotherapy (P < 0.05); and (5) were referred to a joint clinic (P < 0.001). When gynaecologists operated the likelihood of smaller residual disease increased (P < 0.001). The improved survival from management by a multidisciplinary team at a joint clinic was not solely due to the prescription of platinum chemotherapy. The results of this study support the contents of the 1991 Department of Health report on present acceptable practice in the management of ovarian cancer, circulated to gynaecologists and surgeons in Scotland in 1992. The new finding that in a common cancer management by a multidisciplinary team at a joint clinic directly affects survival requires urgent attention.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of malignant teratoma: does referral to a specialist unit matter?The Lancet, 1993
- Treatment Results and Prognostic Factors in a Population-Based Study of Epithelial Ovarian CancerGynecologic Oncology, 1993
- Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Improved prognosis of ovarian cancer in The Netherlands during the period 1975–1985: A registry-based studyGynecologic Oncology, 1991
- Geographical variation in cancer patient survival in Finland: chance, confounding, or effect of treatment?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990
- Do treatment protocols improve end results? A study of survival of patients with multiple myeloma in Finland.BMJ, 1989
- Treatment centre size, entry to trials, and survival in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1989
- A meta-analysis of prognostic factors in advanced ovarian cancer with median survival and overall survival (measured with the log (relative risk)) as main objectivesEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Participants in prospective, randomized clinical trials for resected non-small cell lung cancer have improved survival compared with nonparticipants in such trialsCancer, 1985
- Histology of epithelial tumors of the ovary: clinical usefulness and prognostic significance of the histologic classification and grading.1975