Quality of group communication as a determinant of group product
- 1 August 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Speech Monographs
- Vol. 39 (3) , 166-173
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757209375754
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between quality of communication and the product of the small group. The purposes of the study were (1) to manipulate the quality of communication in problem‐solving groups, (2) to determine whether groups actually experienced communication of varying quality, and, if so, (3) to determine whether groups experiencing high quality communication produced a high quality product. Quality of communication was measured by the Leathers Feedback Rating Instrument. Quality of product was measured by a new Productivity Rating Instrument developed for this study. Results showed a strong, positive relationship between quality of communication and group product.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process disruption and measurement in small group communicationQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1969
- The Effect of Dissonance between Expected and Obtained Performance upon Task Proficiency and Self-Estimates of Task ProficiencyThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1967
- Group planning and task efficiency.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1967
- Aspects of the criterion problem in small group research: Behavioral domains to be studiedActa Psychologica, 1966
- Feedback in small group communicationQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1966
- Emotional Control as a Factor in Productivity of Small Interaction GroupsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1964
- Decision Time Characteristics of Leaders and Group Problem-Solving BehaviorThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1963
- The Relationship between Certain Group Process Variables and Group Problem-Solving EfficiencyThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1960
- Communication Structure, Decision Structure and Group PerformanceSociometry, 1960
- An Experimental Test of the Effect of Training on Discussion LeadershipHuman Relations, 1953