Implementing Curriculum-Based Measurement in Special and Regular Education Settings
- 1 November 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 52 (3) , 266-276
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298505200307
Abstract
Curriculum-based measurement offers special and regular educators an alternative to traditional standardized achievement testing. As a viable alternative assessment system it has been developed as a technically adequate approach in which pupil progress may be monitored frequently in the curriculum. The studies presented in this article document the benefits of implementing CBM in both special and regular education settings. In Study I CBM is demonstrated to be a valid and reliable measurement system that aides teacher decisions regarding student placement, progress, and intervention effectiveness in an elementary school. A survey of teacher attitudes is also presented. Study II outlines the implementation of CBM in a large school-based resource program serving 1,100 mildly handicapped children. The data presented for this study indicate that CBM may be successfully utilized in making screening, identification, program planning, progress monitoring, and program evaluation decisions for children with learning difficulties.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differentiating Mildly Handicapped, Low-Achieving, and Regular Education StudentsRemedial and Special Education, 1985
- Curriculum-Based Measurement: An Alternative To Traditional Screening, Referral, and IdentificationThe Journal of Special Education, 1984
- Eligibility for Learning Disability Services: A Direct and Repeated Measurement ApproachExceptional Children, 1984
- How to Write Effective Data-Based IEFsTEACHING Exceptional Children, 1984
- The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of LearningAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1984
- Instructional planning: information collected by school psychologists vs. information considered useful by teachersJournal of School Psychology, 1982
- Valid Measurement Procedures for Continuous Evaluation of Written ExpressionExceptional Children, 1982
- Measuring Pupil Progress toward the Least Restrictive AlternativeLearning Disability Quarterly, 1979
- Standardized Achievement Tests: How Useful for Special Education?Exceptional Children, 1978
- Two dimensions of tests: Psychometric and edumetric.American Psychologist, 1974