Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of
- 19 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 74 (25) , 5144-5147
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.74.5144
Abstract
The system with has traditionally been modeled with a “double-exchange” Hamiltonian in which it is assumed that the only relevant physics is the tendency of carrier hopping to line up neighboring spins. We present a solution of the double-exchange model, show it is incompatible with many aspects of the data, and propose that in addition to double-exchange physics a strong electron-phonon interaction arising from the Jahn-Teller splitting of the outer Mn level plays a crucial role.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thousandfold Change in Resistivity in Magnetoresistive La-Ca-Mn-O FilmsScience, 1994
- Non-Hermitian quantum dynamicsPhysical Review A, 1990
- Homogeneous Dynamical Conductivity of Simple MetalsPhysical Review B, 1972
- The crystallographic and magnetic structures of La1−xBaxMn1−xMexO3 (Me = Mn or Ti)Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 1971
- Studies of the ionic ferromagnet (LaPb)MnO3. V. Electric transport and ferromagnetic propertiesCanadian Journal of Physics, 1970
- Resistive Anomalies at Magnetic Critical PointsPhysical Review Letters, 1968
- Effects of Double Exchange in Magnetic CrystalsPhysical Review B, 1960
- Considerations on Double ExchangePhysical Review B, 1955
- Theory of the Role of Covalence in the Perovskite-Type ManganitesPhysical Review B, 1955
- Interaction between the-Shells in the Transition Metals. II. Ferromagnetic Compounds of Manganese with Perovskite StructurePhysical Review B, 1951