Behavioral Risk Factors in Emergency Department Patients: A Multisite Survey

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: Many people rely on EDs for routine health care. Often, however, screening and counseling for health risks are not provided. Objective: To determine prevalence rates of chronic disease and injury risk factors and access to routine health care in a random sample of ED patients in 3 cities. Methods: A prospective survey was conducted at 3 hospital EDs in Akron, OH, Boston, MA, and Denver, CO. A modified version of the national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey was administered by trained researchers to a convenience sample of non‐critically ill patients during randomly selected shifts. Results: Of 1,143 eligible patients, 923 (81%) agreed to participate. Their mean age was 39 (range = 17–96) years. Most were female (58%), white (60%), and unmarried (68%). Thirty‐eight percent had no access to primary care. Injury‐prone behaviors were prevalent: 53% of the respondents did not wear seat belts regularly; 15% had no working smoke detector; 3% kept loaded, unlocked handguns in their homes; 11% had attempted suicide; 23% had a positive CAGE screen for alcoholism; 3% had operated a motor vehicle in the preceding month while alcohol‐intoxicated; and 11% had ridden in an automobile with an intoxicated driver. Cancer and chronic disease risks were also common: 48% smoked; 16% had not received a blood pressure check in the preceding year; and 4% reported unsafe sexual practices. Among women aged >50 years, 42% had not received a Pap test in the prior 2 years and 14% had never had mammography. Many prevalence rates and access to care varied among the 3 sites. However, for most risk factors, prevalence rates did not differ in patients with and without access to primary health care. Conclusions: ED patients have high rates of injury and chronic disease risks, and many have no other source of routine health care. Research is needed to determine whether ED‐based programs, designed to reduce injury and chronic disease risks, are feasible and cost‐effective.