THE ACTION POTENTIALS OF THE AUDITORY NERVE
- 30 September 1935
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content
- Vol. 113 (2) , 476-504
- https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1935.113.2.476
Abstract
Action potentials of auditory nerve of the cat were led by coaxial electrodes through a resistance-capacity coupled amplifier and recorded with a cathode ray oscillograph. Continued stimulation, by clicks from a dynatron oscillator (60-12,000 c.p.s.) fed through a loud speaker, leads to a decrease in potential size as stimulation frequency increases. This "equilibration," involving decrease in the potential of each fiber and increase in the number of fibers responding alternately, shows a fast phase within 2 sec. and a slow one within 7 min. Above 1000 c.p.s. the unequilibrated response decreases by half, an octave higher it decreases again, and above 3000 c.p.s. asyn-chrony occurs. The lowest frequency indicating alter-nation of activity yields a measure of the "functional" refractory period of the sensori-neural mechanism, including the non-medullated peripheral terminations of the axons. This period is at most 1 ms. since alternation occurs at 1000 c.p.s. and the frequency of impulses in a fiber 1000/sec. Results support the "place resonance" theory of audition, since the ventral part of the nerve is more sensitive to lower tones and has a longer latency than does the dorsal part and since the cochlear response of the cat is similar to that of man. Response to clicks, recorded at the round window, shows the cochlear response to be followed by 1 to 3 groups of waves, differing in latency, maximal amplitude and threshold; the anatomical correlation ia unknown. The velocity of conduction in the auditory nerve is about 30 m/sec. Nerve impulses are initiated during the development of negative pressure at the tympanum. The stronger the stimulus, the less is the latency. Nerve response to 1 sound may be masked by simultaneous stimulation with another sound due to the refractory period, but the cochlear response shows an algebraic summation. The cochlear response is thought to be non-neural, the delay between cochlear response and nerve action potential being explained by chemical mediation of excitation between the sensory cells of the nerve fiber rather than solely by the conduction time. Pitch and loudness of audition are not functions of the nerve, but "masking" is due to the refractory period of the nerve.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE REFRACTORY PERIOD OF THE MOTONEURONESAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1935
- PERSISTENCE OF COCHLEAR ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE ON AUDITORY STIMULATION IN THE PRESENCE OF COCHLEAR GANGLION DEGENERATIONAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1934
- The ‘Wever and Bray phenomenon.’ A study of the electrical response in the cochlea with especial reference to its originThe Journal of Physiology, 1934
- THE ELECTRIC RESPONSE OF THE COCHLEAAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1934
- AN AMPLIFIER, RECORDING SYSTEM, AND STIMULATING DEVICES FOR THE STUDY OF CEREBRAL ACTION CURRENTSAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1934
- A COMPARISON OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF AXONS THROUGH THEIR INDIVIDUAL ELECTRICAL RESPONSESAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1933
- ACTION CURRENTS IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMArchives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 1932
- QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF THE NERVE IMPULSEAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1929
- ELECTRIC RESPONSES TO ACOUSTIC STIMULI IN THE DECEREBRATE ANIMALAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1927
- THE ACTION POTENTIAL WAVES TRANSMITTED BETWEEN THE SCIATIC NERVE AND ITS SPINAL ROOTSAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1926