The effects of hedges and hesitations on impression formation in a simulated courtroom context
- 1 August 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Western Journal of Speech Communication
- Vol. 51 (2) , 173-188
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318709374263
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to refine the concepts of powerful and powerless speech styles by investigating evaluative reactions to hedges and hesitations in a simulated trial context. We asked whether hedges, hesitations, and respondent sex would interact to affect listeners’ evaluations of a speaker. We also asked whether these language variables affected perceptions of guilt. We found that a low level of hedges and hesitations produced the most positive evaluations of authoritativeness and attractiveness. The study also revealed that these variables affected perceptions of guilt.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles: Attributional consequences of specific language features and communicator intentionsCommunication Monographs, 1984
- Disclaiming: A test of two competing viewsCommunication Quarterly, 1984
- Beyond External ValidityJournal of Consumer Research, 1983
- External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments.American Psychologist, 1982
- On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speechJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978
- Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Storytelling in criminal trials: A model of social judgmentQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1978
- Perception of the Personality of the Hesitant SpeakerPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1968
- Hesitations in children's speech during explanation and descriptionJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967