Variable reporting and quantitative reviews: a comparison of three meta‐analytical techniques
- 14 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Ecology Letters
- Vol. 6 (5) , 448-454
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00448.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parasites as a Viability Cost of Sexual Selection in Natural Populations of MammalsScience, 2002
- Reconsidering the null hypothesis: Is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
- How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists?Oecologia, 2002
- Host range and local parasite adaptationProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio AdjustmentScience, 2002
- Testing and adjusting for publication biasTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001
- Manipulation of host behaviour by parasites: a weakening paradigm?Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- A Meta‐Analysis of Adaptive Deme Formation in Phytophagous Insect PopulationsThe American Naturalist, 1998
- Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolutionTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1995
- Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean DifferencesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1984