Town or country: which is best for Australia's Indigenous peoples?
- 21 May 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 186 (10) , 532-533
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01030.x
Abstract
Some commentators suggest that the poor health of Australiaˈs Indigenous population is due to misguided ideology‐driven policy that has forced people to live in remote communities, preventing them from benefiting from the mainstream economy. The evidence shows that the poor health status of Indigenous people is found in all areas where they live and that, on some indicators, living in remote areas has health benefits. Government policies aimed at relocating Indigenous people from their traditional lands are not supported by evidence, and may further entrench Indigenous disadvantage.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Growth and morbidity in children in the Aboriginal Birth Cohort Study: the urban–remote differentialThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2003
- Comparing Indigenous health status across regions: a numerical example of uncertaintyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2002
- Self-Assessed Health Among Indigenous Australians: How Valid Is a Global Question?American Journal of Public Health, 2001
- Obliged to be DifficultPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- Beneficial impact of the Homelands Movement on health outcomes in central Australian AboriginesAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 1998