Price Stability with Imperfect Financial Integration
Preprint
- 1 January 2001
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This paper evaluates the welfare implications of policy rules when international financial markets are incomplete. Using a two-country dynamic general equilibrium model with incomplete markets, price stickiness and monopolistic competition, one finds that an allocation in which the producer inflation rates in both countries are stabilized to zero reproduces the flexible-price allocation. However, this allocation is sub-optimal with deadweight losses evaluated around 0.05 percent of a permanent shift in steady-state consumption. A state-contingent producer inflation policy is the feasible first-best. But, the gains from pursuing this policy instead of price stability are small in terms of reduction in the deadweight losses. Therefore, under incomplete markets, price stability is a good approximation of the feasible first best policy.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal monetary policy in a currency areaJournal of International Economics, 2003
- Optimal Monetary Policy in Closed versus Open Economies: An Integrated ApproachPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2001
- Optimal monetary policy responses to relative-price changesJournal of Monetary Economics, 2001
- Real Exchange Rate Persistence and Monetary Policy RulesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Can Sticky Price Models Generate Volatile and Persistent Real Exchange Rates?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2000
- The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian PerspectiveJournal of Economic Literature, 1999
- Business Cycles and the Asset Structure of Foreign TradeInternational Economic Review, 1995
- International Real Business CyclesJournal of Political Economy, 1992
- Commodity Trade and International Risk Sharing: How Much Do Financial Markets Matter?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1989
- Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing frameworkJournal of Monetary Economics, 1983