Risk Indicators of Low Back Pain Among Workers in Japan
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 22 (11) , 1242-1247
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199706010-00014
Abstract
A questionnaire was given to 3,042 Japanese workers at a factory in 1992. It surveyed age, gender, weight, height, job classification, and work environment, as well as the perceived causes, onset age, and characteristics of low back pain. Family history of low back pain among first-degree relatives and perception of physical condition also were assessed. To investigate the risk indicators of low back pain in Japanese workers with various kinds of job classifications in a manufacturing company. Risk indicators of low back pain in Japanese patients have not been fully investigated in previous studies. Prevalence rates and characteristics of low back pain were examined among 3,042 factory workers (2,517 men and 525 women) with jobs with varying physical demands. In the analysis of risk indicators of low back pain, the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed. In addition, a multiple logistic analysis was performed to evaluate risk indicators of low back pain. Point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain were correlated with the physical demands of the job. The perceived cause found to be most associated with low back pain were lifting in workers with jobs requiring moderate to heavy work and sports activity in sedentary workers. Family history of low back pain in parents, siblings, and children was a risk indicator of low back pain. The average age of the first attack of low back pain in workers with a family history of it in their parents was significantly younger than that in workers with no family history. In a multiple logistic analysis in male workers, the physical work demands, age, and family history of low back pain in their parents were risk indicators; however, obesity was not a risk indicator. Physical and mental conditions of workers also were associated with low back pain. The physical job demands show a clear association with the point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain, and improvements in work conditions may decrease low back symptoms among workers. It is likely that a family history of low back pain and physical and mental conditions of workers also should be considered in the management of low back pain.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Cross-Sectional” Study of Low Back Pain Among Workers at an Industrial Enterprise in RussiaSpine, 1995
- Low-Back Pain and OccupationSpine, 1989
- Epidemiologic Study of Back Pain in Miners and Office WorkersSpine, 1986
- Psychologic Factors in Low-Back-Pain DisabilityPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1985
- Low-Back Pain in 40− to 47-Year-Old MenSpine, 1983
- Epidemiologic Aspects on Low-Back Pain in IndustrySpine, 1981
- AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF ACUTE HERNIATED LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCSRheumatology, 1975
- THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LITTLE-FINGER MOBILITY, LUMBAR MOBILITY, STRAIGHT-LEG RAISING, AND LOW-BACK PAINRheumatology, 1974
- Disk Protrusions in the YoungPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1972
- Rheumatic complaints among workers in iron foundries.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1968