Five-Year Outcomes After Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 96 (18) , 1358-1367
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259
Abstract
Background: Men treated for clinically localized prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy usually survive many years with the side effects of these treatments. We present treatment-specific quality-of-life outcomes for prostate cancer patients 5 years after initial diagnosis. Methods: The cohort consisted of men aged 55–74 years who were newly diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer in 1994–1995 and were treated with radical prostatectomy (n = 901) or external beam radiotherapy (n = 286). We used clinical and quality-of-life data previously collected at the time of diagnosis (i.e., baseline) and at the 2-year follow-up and data newly collected at 5 years after diagnosis to compare urinary, bowel, and sexual function and to examine temporal changes in those functions. Odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted percentages were calculated by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: At 5 years after diagnosis, overall sexual function declined in both groups to approximately the same level. However, at 5 years after diagnosis, erectile dysfunction was more prevalent in the radical prostatectomy group than in the external beam radiotherapy group (79.3% versus 63.5%; OR = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6 to 3.8). Approximately 14%–16% of radical prostatectomy and 4% of external beam radiotherapy patients were incontinent at 5 years (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 2.2 to 8.6). Bowel urgency and painful hemorrhoids were more common in the external beam radiotherapy group than in the radical prostatectomy group. All of these differences remained statistically significant after adjustment for confounders and for differences between treatment groups in some baseline characteristics. Conclusions: At 5 years after diagnosis, men treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer continue to experience worse urinary incontinence than men treated with external beam radiotherapy. However, the two treatment groups were more similar to each other with respect to overall sexual function, mostly because of a continuing decline in erectile function among the external beam radiotherapy patients between years 2 and 5.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Related Quality of Life in Men With Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2003
- Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful WaitingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy with Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapyCancer, 2002
- Radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate carcinomaCancer, 2002
- Adjustment to cancer?coping or personal transition?Psycho‐Oncology, 2001
- Comparison of Recommendations by Urologists and Radiation Oncologists for Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 2000
- Sex-Specific Expression of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor: Relationship to Smoking History and Risk of Lung CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Prostate Cancer Practice Patterns and Quality of Life: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes StudyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Population-based study of long-term survival in patients with clinically localised prostate cancerThe Lancet, 1997