Clinical evaluation of the minitek differential system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae
- 1 November 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 4 (5) , 400-404
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.4.5.400-404.1976
Abstract
Stock organisms (41) and 581 fresh clinical isolates were used in comparing the Minitek system to conventional tubed media to determine if this system is feasible and accurate for a high-volume clinical microbiology laboratory. Reproducibility of disks, the effect of variation in inoculum size, the effect of the age of culture, and the effect of predispensing disks were also tested. A total of 5947 disks were compared with tube reactions; 95.9% agreed on the initial reading. After repeating questionable tube and disk reactions, this agreement rose to 98.2%. Using the disk reactions and the identification schema currently in use with tubed media, 94.9% of the Minitek final identifications agreed with those of tubed media; 1.5% gave differing identifications and 3.6% were inconclusive. This system is accurate, inexpensive, flexible and convenient.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteriaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1976
- Evaluation of the BBL Minitek system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.1974
- Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.1974