Assessment of a scoring system for breast imaging
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 85 (5) , 669-672
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00633.x
Abstract
Background: Triple assessment is the standard method of assessing symptomatic breast lumps. There is an accepted format for reporting cytology but not for the reporting of mammograms or breast ultrasonographic images. This study describes a scoring system for reporting breast imaging methods. Methods: Patients with symptomatic breast lumps seen during 1 year were included. All patients underwent triple assessment. Imaging studies were reported using a grading system from 1 to 5. The results of triple assessment were compared with the final histology. Results: Some 127 women had both mammography and ultrasonographic imaging; the final grade was identical in 60 per cent. The positive predictive value of imaging reported as grade 5 or 4 combined with cytology of C5 or C4 was 100 per cent. All lesions with C3 cytology and benign imaging were benign on histological examination whereas if a C3 grade was combined with imaging grade 5 or 4, all the lesions were malignant. Conclusion: Combining the imaging grade with the results of aspiration cytology and clinical examination often predicts the final histology in patients with breast disease.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of the “Triple Test” for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savingsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- ABC of Breast Diseases : Symptoms Assessment and Guidelines for ReferralBMJ, 1994
- Can Fine-Needle Aspiration Replace Open Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Lesions?American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1992
- Fine needle aspiration cytology, in relationships to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of a solid breast massBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984