Influence of Triple-Lumen Central Venous Catheters Coated With Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine on the Incidence of Catheter-Related Bacteremia
Open Access
- 12 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 158 (1) , 81-87
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.1.81
Abstract
DESPITE IMPROVEMENT in central venous catheter (CVC) design and insertion techniques, catheter-related infections continue to be a significant problem in the intensive care unit.1-3 One popular strategy to reduce these infections is scheduled CVC change over a guidewire; however, several studies4,5 have indicated that this approach does not reduce the risk of infection. A collagen cuff impregnated with silver that fits around the CVC and resides in a subcutaneous pocket was shown to reduce the density of growth of bacteria on the catheter in some but not all studies.6-9 None of these studies individually demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB); however, pooled data from 2 studies6,7 suggest that the use of the cuff resulted in a significant decrease in the rate of CRB.7 This product has not gained widespread popularity possibly because the use of the cuff can be cumbersome and a substantial portion of these cuffs extrude from their pockets over time. Antibiotic-bonded CVCs have been used in several animal and clinical studies,10-13 but concerns about the emergence of resistant organisms and the time needed to bond the catheter with antibiotics at the bedside has limited the use of this approach. The CVC coated with the antiseptic combination product of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (CSS) represents the latest strategy to combat catheter infections. Although several recent abstracts suggest that these coated CVCs are effective in reducing the local burden of bacterial growth and the incidence of CRB,14-16 2 recent studies17,18 evaluating these catheters in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition suggest a lack of efficacy. We present our results of a prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of CVCs coated with CSS compared with uncoated CVCs in reducing the incidence of catheter-related infctions.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decreased bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters implanted in swineCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Incidence of catheter colonization and catheter related infection with an antiseptic impregnated triple lumen catheterCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of the Effect of Silver Impregnated Subcutaneous Cuffs for Preventing Tunneled Chronic Venous Access Catheter Infections in Cancer PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Efficacy of Antibiotic-Coated Catheters in Preventing Subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus Infection in RabbitsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1993
- A Controlled Trial of Scheduled Replacement of Central Venous and Pulmonary-Artery CathetersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Reduced intravascular catheter infection by antibiotic bonding. A prospective, randomized, controlled trialJAMA, 1991
- Catheter-Related Infections and Associated SepticemiaChest, 1991
- Efficacy of dicloxacillin-coated polyurethane catheters in preventing subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in miceAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1989
- Efficacy of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection. A randomized, controlled trialPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: A prospective randomized multicenter trialThe American Journal of Medicine, 1988