Are inbreeders better colonizers?
- 1 May 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 49 (2) , 283-286
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00349202
Abstract
In order to test whether inbreeders are better colonizers, the Flora of the British Isles was surveyed for tabulating the distribution of colonizers and noncolonizers in relation to breeding systems and longevity. Several criteria and difficulties associated with such comparative surveys are briefly discussed. No overwhelming evidence for association was found between longevity and colonizing ability although predominant selfing was found to be significantly more common among the colonizers. However, such evidence for associations among various genetic and ecological factors accounting for high colonizing ability must be interpreted with caution when the role of longevity, ploidy, interfamily and interpopulation genetic variation, uncertainties about the habitat classification, etc., are taken into accountKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- EVOLUTION OF INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS IN PLANTS: ORIGIN OF ‘INDEPENDENT’ AND ‘COMPLEMENTARY’ CONTROL OF INCOMPATIBILITY IN ANGIOSPERMSNew Phytologist, 1980
- Relationships Between Life History Characteristics and Electrophoretically Detectable Genetic Variation in PlantsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1979
- ECOLOGICAL GENETICS OF THE COLONIZING ABILITY OF ROSE CLOVER (TRIFOLIUM HIRTUM ALL.)American Journal of Botany, 1979
- Density-Dependent Seed Germination Strategies in Colonizing Versus Non- Colonizing Plant SpeciesJournal of Ecology, 1976
- Niche specialization and species diversity along a California transectOecologia, 1975
- The Evolution of WeedsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1974
- The Systematics of Lopezieae (Onagraceae)Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1973
- SUPPORT FOR BAKER'S LAW-AS A RULEEvolution, 1967
- CYTOGENETIC FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVOLUTION OF WEEDSTaxon, 1967
- Mode of reproduction of higher plantsThe Botanical Review, 1957