Comparative Feeding Value of Supplemental Fat in Finishing Diets for Feedlot Steers Supplemented with and Without Monensin
Open Access
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 66 (1) , 213-227
- https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.661213x
Abstract
Two comparative slaughter trials and a metabolism trial were conducted. Treatments consisted of: 1) 0 fat, 0 monensin; 2) 4% yellow grease, 0 monensin; 3) 0 fat, 33 mg/kg monensin and 4) 4% yellow grease, 33 mg/kg monensin. Trial 1 involved 104 crossbred beef steers (267 kg) in a 140-d comparative slaughter trial. There were no interactions (P>.20) between supplemental fat and monensin on steer performance. Monensin supplementation decreased rate of weight gain (P<.10) and feed intake (P<.05) with no effect on energy value of the diet (P>.20). Fat supplementation increased (P<.01) rate of weight gain 12.5% and increased the net energy for maintenance (NEm) and net energy for gain (NEg) value of the diet 8.5 and 9.4%, respectively. Trial 2 involved 154 Holstein steers (290 kg) in a 94-d comparative slaughter trial. There were no interactions between supplemental fat and monensin (P>.20). Monensin supplementation did not affect rate or composition of gain (P>.20), but supplementation reduced (P<.05) feed intake and feed required per unit weight gain 3.6%. Fat supplementation increased (P<.01) fat and energy gain 12.5 and 10.3%, respectively, and the NEm and NEg content of the diet 7.5 and 8.4%, respectively. Trial 3 utilized four crossbred beef steers (220 kg) with cannulas in the rumen, proximal duodenum and distal ileum. There were no interactions between supplemental fat and monensin with respect to site of digestion (P>.20). Supplemental fat did not affect (P>.20) organic matter, starch, fiber or N digestion. Intestinal digestibility of fat averaged 77.3%. Monensin increased (P<.10) intestinal digestibility of fat 7.4%. There were negative associative effects between supplemental fat and monensin on ruminal acetate:propionate ratios and estimated methane production. It was concluded that the feeding value of feed fat is underestimated in tables of feed standards currently in use, and that the net effects of monensin on these estimates are additive.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- ENERGY UTILIZATION BY GROWING CATTLE AS DETERMINED IN 72 COMPARATIVE SLAUGHTER EXPERIMENTSPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- Energy Utilization, Feedlot Performance and Fatty Acid Composition of Beef Steers Fed Protein Encapsulated Tallow or Vegetable OilsJournal of Animal Science, 1976
- Effect of Monensin Fed with Forage on Digestion and the Ruminal Ecosystem of SteersJournal of Animal Science, 1976
- Digestibility of Hydrogenated Tallow, Saturated Fatty Acids and Soybean Oil-Supplemented Diets by SheepJournal of Animal Science, 1972
- The metabolism of oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids by sheep with reference to their effects on methane productionBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1966
- Net Energy of Fat and Molasses for Beef Heifers with Observations on the Method for Net Energy DeterminationJournal of Animal Science, 1965
- Effect of Oleic and Linoleic Acids on the Absorption of Saturated Fatty Acids in the ChickJournal of Nutrition, 1963
- Comparison of Metabolizable Energy and Productive Energy Determinations with Growing ChicksJournal of Nutrition, 1958
- Further Studies Concerning the Effects of Fats in Sheep RationsJournal of Animal Science, 1958
- The Effect of Added Fat on the Digestion of Cellulose and Protein by Ovine Rumen MicroorganismsJournal of Animal Science, 1954