Standing to Sue: Interest Group Conflict in the Federal Courts
- 1 September 1976
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 70 (3) , 723-741
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1959864
Abstract
The law of standing—rules by which judges find whether a party may bring suit—has been liberalized in the federal courts to permit interest group disputes not ordinarily possible. Following an historical pattern of conflict containment within judicial-style processes, consumer and environmental groups contest corporate business decisions by challenging the legality of their regulatory or legislative authorization. The vagueness and substantive emphasis of the new rules give groups more influence in determining when courts will intervene in the affairs of the other branches; and the doctrine's recognition of noneconomic injuries logically forces judges to consider whether they may find standing for some “public interest” beyond a specific plaintiff. Changes in standing equalize social power; but the entanglement of courts in the puzzles of interest representation may restrict protections for strictly private litigants, and may further remove the political system from the Rule of Law.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standing to Challenge Administrative Action: An Inadequate Surrogate for Claim for ReliefThe Yale Law Journal, 1974
- Constitutional Adjudication: The Who and WhenThe Yale Law Journal, 1973
- Standing in the Supreme Court: A Functional AnalysisHarvard Law Review, 1973
- Public Participation in Administrative ProceedingsThe Yale Law Journal, 1972
- The Unions and the CitiesThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1972
- Standing AgainHarvard Law Review, 1971
- Venturing to Do JusticePublished by Harvard University Press ,1969
- The Citizen as Litigant in Public Actions: The Non-Hohfeldian or Ideological PlaintiffUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1968
- Private Power and American Democracy, by Grant McConnellPolitical Science Quarterly, 1967
- Judicial Review and the Political Question: A Functional AnalysisThe Yale Law Journal, 1966