Making Moral Decisions on a Double-blinded Drug Trial in Progress without Breaking the Code
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 9 (3) , 207-216
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x8900900309
Abstract
The double blinding of drug trials to prevent bias deprives physicians of information they need in order to comply with their duty to treat patients and do them no harm. This ethical dilemma can be ameliorated with a standard statistical method known as posterior analysis. The clinical researcher can use posterior analysis to calculate the probability that a patient in a double-blinded drug trial is in the placebo group, based on the patient's clinical status. The clinician can also calculate the probability that the drug is safe and efficacious, as compared with the placebo, without breaking the code.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complexity and contradiction in clinical trial researchThe American Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The ethics of randomized clinical trialsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Court Viewpoints and Medical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1986
- The Conflict Between Randomized Clinical Trials and the Therapeutic ObligationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1986
- Consent and Randomized Clinical Trials: Are There Moral or Design Problems?Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1986
- Which depressions respond to placebo?Psychiatry Research, 1986
- Rational Diagnosis and TreatmentJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1986
- How informed is informed consent?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- The randomized clinical trial: bias in analysis.Circulation, 1981
- A co-operative trial in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease using clofibrate. Report from the Committee of Principal Investigators.Heart, 1978