Implementing the Stockholm Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants
Open Access
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Vol. 59 (10) , 651-652
- https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.59.10.651
Abstract
Implementation of the Stockholm Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants is a unique opportunity to foster changes in environmental, occupational, and food policies In the forthcoming months many scientific, technical, and political energies will be devoted throughout the world to design specific plans to implement the Stockholm Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs).1–,4 Drawn under the leadership of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)—with significant contributions from non-governmental organisations, trade unions, and private companies—it has been saluted as “a global public health treaty”, one that will “protect public health both from DDT and malaria”, “the first global agreement ever to seek to ban an entire class of chemicals because of their direct effects on human health”.3,4 After four years of work, in December 2000 this “international legally binding instrument” was finalised. In May 2001 delegates from over one hundred countries (including the United States, Canada, and all members of the European Union) signed the accord in Stockholm. It is expected to be put into effect by 2004, after 50 nations have ratified it (so far, eight countries have done so).1 Meanwhile, governments can facilitate voluntary implementation of the agreement prior to its entry into force. Implementation of the treaty at all population levels (municipal, regional, continental) constitutes a fantastic opportunity to foster changes in environmental, occupational, public health, and food policies. But the challenges are immense. The substances covered by the treaty are eight pesticides (aldrin, chlordane, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, mirex, and toxaphene), two industrial chemicals (hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)), and two POP by-products (dioxins and furans).1,2 The first 10 compounds, except DDT, are included in Annex A (elimination): the aim is to cease their production, use, and trade. The agreement prohibits production of PCBs immediately, and requires countries to …Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Persistent toxic chemicals in the US food supplyJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- Bovine spongiform encephalopathy, persistent organic pollutants, and the achievable utopiasJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- Concentraciones de compuestos tóxicos persistentes en la población española: el rompecabezas sin piezas y la protección de la salud públicaGaceta Sanitaria, 2002
- The elaboration of the ‘Stockholm Convention’ on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): A negotiation process fraught with obstacles and opportunitiesEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 2001
- The Belgian PCB and dioxin incident of January-June 1999: exposure data and potential impact on health.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- The Global Distribution of PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides in ButterEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2001
- Exposure of populations to dioxins and related compoundsFood Additives & Contaminants, 2000
- Determinants ofp,p'-Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDE) Concentration in Adipose Tissue in Women from Five European CitiesArchives of environmental health, 1999
- Assessing the cancer risk from environmental PCBs.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998
- Some Dietary Predictors of Plasma Organochlorine Concentrations in an Elderly German PopulationArchives of environmental health, 1998