"No Language Restrictions" in Database Searches: What Does This Really Mean?
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1) , 205-207
- https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.205
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the coverage of non-English journals by MEDLINE® and EMBASE, the two major biomedical databases used for identifying studies for possible inclusion in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A series of searches were conducted to compare the coverage of journals in languages other than English. The results were compared against listings in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, an authoritative source of information on periodicals published in more than 200 countries. This study has highlighted the existence of a database coverage bias, in terms of the systematic exclusion of journals from certain countries and/or in certain languages. Searching that relies only on English language databases may result in failure to find many relevant studies published in languages other than English, irrespective of the research question and the avoidance of any language restrictions.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviewsHealth Technology Assessment, 2003
- How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical studyHealth Technology Assessment, 2003
- Commentary: Searching for trials for systematic reviews: what difference does it make?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical studyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled TrialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1998
- Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviewsThe Lancet, 1996