EVOLUTION OF GREGARIOUSNESS IN APOSEMATIC BUTTERFLY LARVAE: A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS
- 1 March 1988
- Vol. 42 (2) , 293-305
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb04133.x
Abstract
Gregariousness ought to be disadvantageous for palatable organisms that live exposed and are relatively immobile and small in comparison to potential predators. Therefore, the idea that unpalatability generally evolves before egg clustering/larval gregariousness in butterflies was tested. Aposematic coloration in the larva was used as the criterion of unpalatability (it is argued that Batesian mimicry is rare in butterfly larvae), and the relative order of evolution of aposematism and gregariousness was inferred through phylogenetic analysis. Here, existing phylogenies were used, and the analysis was based on an assumption of a minimum number of evolutionary changes (parsimony). A total of 23 cases of independent evolution of gregariousness and 12 cases of independent evolution of aposematic coloration were found. In five cases, gregariousness evolved in cryptic species, the palatability of which is unknown. For lineages in which both unpalatability, as evidenced by aposematic coloration, and gregariousness were found and the two evolutionary events could be separated, unpalatability always preceded gregariousness: five cases of independent evolution of warning coloration were followed by a total of 15 cases of independent evolution of gregariousness. In no lineage did gregariousness evolve before warning coloration. It is thus concluded that unpalatability is an important predisposing factor for the evolution of egg clustering and larval gregariousness in butterflies. Insofar as kin selection is related to larval gregariousness, this study indicates that kin selection is of minor importance for the evolution of both unpalatability and warning coloration.Funding Information
- Swedish Natural Science Research Council
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive Versus Constraint Explanations for Egg-to-Body Size Relationships in Two Butterfly FamiliesThe American Naturalist, 1987
- The Evolution of Aposematic Coloration by Individual Selection: A Life-Span Survival ModelOikos, 1986
- Problèmes de systématique dans la famille des Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera)Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1985
- The Evolution of Egg Clustering by Butterflies and Other InsectsThe American Naturalist, 1984
- EGG DISPERSAL PATTERNS AND ADULT FEEDING BEHAVIOUR IN THE LEPIDOPTERAThe Canadian Entomologist, 1983
- Individual versus Kin Selection for Aposematic Coloration: A Reply to Harvey and PaxtonOikos, 1981
- The Cost of Being Aposematic. An Experimental Study of Predation on Larvae of Papilio Machaon by the Great Tit Parus MajorOikos, 1981
- Egg Deposition Patterns in Butterflies: Why Do Some Species Cluster Their Eggs Rather Than Deposit Them Singly?The American Naturalist, 1980
- Coevolutionary Race Continues: Butterfly Larval Adaptation to Plant TrichomesScience, 1975
- Defensive Secretion of a Caterpillar ( Papilio )Science, 1965