Potential Risks and Benefits of HIV Treatment Simplification: A Simulation Model of a Proposed Clinical Trial
Open Access
- 15 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 45 (8) , 1062-1070
- https://doi.org/10.1086/521933
Abstract
Background. In recent studies, subjects who had achieved suppression of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA level while receiving an initial 3-drug antiretroviral regimen successfully maintained suppression while receiving treatment with a “boosted” protease inhibitor (PI) alone. We projected the long-term outcomes of this treatment simplification strategy to inform the design of a proposed multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Methods. We used published studies to estimate the efficacy, adverse effects, and cost of a sequence of HIV drug regimens for the simplification strategy, compared with those outcomes for the current standard-of-care (SOC) strategy. Using a published simulation model of HIV disease, we projected life expectancy, discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and discounted lifetime medical costs for each strategy. Results. Subjects who have not developed PI-resistant HIV infection at the time of failure of the simplification regimen have a greater life expectancy (27.9 vs. 27.1 years) and QALE (14.9 vs. 14.7 years), compared with SOC subjects, because they receive an additional line of therapy without negative consequences for future treatment options. The QALE for the simplification strategy remains higher than that for the SOC, unless a large proportion of patients experiencing virologic failure while receiving the simplification regimen develop PI resistance. Depending on the probability of simplification regimen failure, the advantage is maintained even if HIV develops PI resistance in 42%–70% of subjects. Projected lifetime costs are $26,500–$72,400 per person lower for the simplification strategy than for the SOC strategy. Conclusions. An HIV treatment simplification strategy involving use of a boosted PI alone may lead to longer survival overall at lower cost, compared with the SOC combination therapy, because the simplification strategy potentially adds an additional line of therapy. The risk of emergence of PI resistance during treatment with a simplified regimen is a critical determinant of the viability of this strategy.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence of Ongoing Immune Reconstitution in Subjects with Sustained Viral Suppression following 6 Years of Lopinavir-Ritonavir TreatmentClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- A Pilot Study of Switch to Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) Monotherapy from Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor–Based TherapyHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2006
- Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir DF vs Stavudine in Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive PatientsA 3-Year Randomized TrialJAMA, 2004
- Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy after Protease Inhibitor Failure: An Analytic OverviewClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients with the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtideAIDS, 2004
- Guidelines for Preventing Opportunistic Infections among HIV-Infected Persons—2002: Recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service and the Infectious Diseases Society of America*Annals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Comparison of Health State Utilities Using Community and Patient Preference Weights Derived from a Survey of Patients with HIV/AIDSMedical Decision Making, 2002
- The Cost Effectiveness of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Preevaluation of Clinical Trial Data: The Case of Preemptive Cytomegalovirus Therapy in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency VirusClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Effect of an Explicit Decision-Support Tool on Decisions to Prescribe Antibiotics for Sore ThroatMedical Decision Making, 1998