Do Drug Prices Reflect Development Time and Government Investment?
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 43 (8) , 753-762
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000170401.17243.53
Abstract
Lengthy development times are cited by the pharmaceutical industry as one reason for high drug prices. We compared the prices of different groups of drugs after accounting for development time, government support, market size, and other drug characteristics. We conducted a retrospective study of 180 human therapeutic drugs categorized into 8 drug groups by assembling data on drug development times, government support, drug characteristics, and prices. First, we compared the development time and level of government support across the 8 drug groups. Second, we assessed the independent effect of drug group on median price per day in a multivariable analysis, controlling for development time and all other variables. Thirty percent of antiretroviral drugs had government patents compared with 16% of other infectious disease drugs, 6% of cancer drugs, and less than 6% of any other drug group (P < 0.002). Fifty percent of antiretrovirals had NIH trials listed in the new drug application for approval by the Food and Drug Administration compared with less than 6% of any other drug group (P < 0.001). More antiretroviral and cancer drugs received fast track status and accelerated review during regulatory review by the Food and Drug Administration (P < 0.001). The median price of antiretrovirals was 8 US dollars per day more, cancer drugs 11 US dollars per day more, than the reference group after adjustment for other variables (P < 0.001). Development time was not associated with drug price. Antiretroviral and cancer drugs, even after accounting for development time, are among the most highly priced medications. Notably, drugs with rapid development and more government support did not have lower drug prices.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Medicare bill targets discrepancies in fees for cancer drugs, outpatient services.JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Benefits And Risks Of Increasing Restrictions On Access To Costly Drugs In MedicaidHealth Affairs, 2004
- The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costsJournal of Health Economics, 2003
- Access to antiretroviral drugs in BrazilThe Lancet, 2002
- Do Patents for Antiretroviral Drugs Constrain Access to AIDS Treatment in Africa?JAMA, 2001
- Perspectives On The Pharmaceutical IndustryHealth Affairs, 2001
- Worldwide Interest in Global Access to DrugsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2001
- New drug development in the United States from 1963 to 1999Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2001
- The Pharmaceutical Industry — To Whom is It Accountable?New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Effects of Limiting Medicaid Drug-Reimbursement Benefits on the Use of Psychotropic Agents and Acute Mental Health Services by Patients with SchizophreniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994