Low Molecular Weight Heparins: Current Use and Indications
Open Access
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 187 (6) , 641-658
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00255-5
Abstract
Thromboembolic complications are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in postoperative patients. For many years, unfractionated heparin has been used successfully in primary and secondary prophylaxis of these complications. In recent times, however, the usefulness of LMWHs has caught the attention of clinicians because of improved bioavailability, predictable anticoagulation, ease of administration, and the lack of need for monitoring anticoagulation. In clinical situations, LMWHs have been tested and proved to be safe and equipotent or supe rior when compared with unfractionated heparin or warfarin (Table 5). It is clear from clinical trials that LMWHs are superior in primary prophylaxis of DVT in orthopaedic surgical procedures, treatment of unstable angina, and in patients with multiple traumas. LMWHs were also tested and found to be an acceptable alternative to unfractionated heparin in both the primary prophylaxis of DVT in high risk general surgical procedures and in the treatment of patients with DVT and pulmonary embolism. However, the role of LMWHs in ischemic heart diseases, valvular heart diseases, postcoronary angioplasty, and vascular surgery remains to be proved. The major impact of LMWHs would be in allowing clinicians to treat PE and DVT in an outpatient setting, which would directly impact medical economics. LMWHs are associated with similar complications as unfractionated heparin is, but the complications occur less frequently. Currently, the main limitation in using LMWHs in place of unfractionated heparin or warfarin is its cost. However, taking into account the cost incurred by hospitalization and longterm monitoring of anticoagulation in patients treated with unfractionated heparin, certain trials have proved the cost of LMWHs to be the same or less than the cost of unfractionated heparin overall. We envision that LMWHs will be widely used in the future and will bring welcomed change in the treatment of thromboembolic diseases.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heparin-Induced ThrombocytopeniaDrug Safety, 1997
- Low-Molecular-Weight HeparinsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Acute Pulmonary EmbolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Patients with Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Low-molecular-weight heparin in pediatric patients with thrombotic disease: A dose finding studyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1996
- Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study of exercise with enoxaparin pretreatment for stable-effort anginaAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Low molecular weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis and epidural/spinal anaesthesia – is there a risk?Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1992
- Pulmonary Embolism in Major Trauma PatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1990
- Reduction in Fatal Pulmonary Embolism and Venous Thrombosis by Perioperative Administration of Subcutaneous HeparinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Anticoagulant therapy by continuous heparinization in newborn and older infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1982