Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings From the Initial Screening Round of a Randomized Trial
Open Access
- 15 March 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 97 (6) , 433-438
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji065
Abstract
Background: The benefit of screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination (DRE) is uncertain and is under evaluation in a randomized prospective trial, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Although the final results are several years away, the initial round of screening is complete. We describe the population enrolled in the PLCO trial, their baseline PSA and DRE screening results, and diagnostic follow-up results during the first year of follow-up. Methods: A total of 38 350 men were randomly assigned to the screening arm of the PLCO trial from November 1993 through June 2001. Men were advised to seek diagnostic follow-up from their primary care provider if their DRE was suspicious for cancer and/or if their serum PSA level was higher than 4 ng/mL. PLCO trial staff obtained records related to diagnostic follow-up. Results: Compliance with both screening tests was high (more than 89%). At screening, 7.5% of men had a positive DRE (i.e., suspicious for cancer) and 7.9% had a PSA level higher than 4 ng/mL. Of the men with positive screening tests, 74.2% underwent additional diagnostic testing, and 31.5% underwent a prostatic biopsy within 1 year. Overall, 1.4% of the men in the screening arm were diagnosed with prostate cancer, the majority of whom had clinically localized cancer. These compliance, biopsy, and cancer detection rates appear to be representative of contemporary practice patterns. Conclusion: The PLCO trial is evaluating PSA- and DRE-based screening for prostate cancer in a clinically valid manner. Whether such screening will result in a reduction of prostate cancer mortality cannot be answered until the randomized comparison is completed.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- PROSTATE BIOPSY FOLLOWING A POSITIVE SCREEN IN THE PROSTATE, LUNG, COLORECTAL AND OVARIAN CANCER SCREENING TRIALJournal of Urology, 2005
- Variation of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen LevelsJAMA, 2003
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Prospective study of cancer detection in black and white men with normal digital rectal examination but prostate specific antigen equal or greater than 4.0 ng/mLCancer, 2002
- Pathologic features of prostate cancer found at population-based screening with a four-year interval.JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN BLACK AND WHITE MEN WITH ABNORMAL DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LESS THAN 4 NG./ML.Journal of Urology, 2000
- The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC): An UpdateEuropean Urology, 1999
- The early detection of prostate carcinoma with prostate specific antigenCancer, 1997
- Serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination for early detection of prostate cancer in a national community-based programUrology, 1996
- The Use of Age-Specific Reference Ranges for Serum Prostate Specific Anitgen in Men 60 years Old or OlderJournal of Urology, 1995