CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF DECEDENT VERSUS LIVING CONTROLS IN A MORTALITY CASE-CONTROL STUDY
- 1 October 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 120 (4) , 635-642
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113925
Abstract
The mortality odds ratio computed with a decedent control series (ORD) and the mortality odds ratio obtained with a living control series (ORL) estimate the mortality rate ratio (RRM) under very different assumptions. The bias of the ORD as an estimate of RRM is a function of the mortality rates from other causes (those causes for which controls were selected) in the underlying exposed (E) and nonoxposed (Ē) populations, while the bias of ORL as an estimate of RRM is a function of the prevalence of the study disease in the underlying E and Ē populations. The ORL closely estimates the RRM If the prevalence of the disease under study is small. If the study disease mortality rate is small relative to the other-causes mortality rate, the ORD closely estimates the cause-specific proportional mortality ratio.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE PROPORTIONATE MORTALITY RATIOAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- Lung Cancer after Employment in Shipyards during World War IINew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- On the utility of proportional mortality analysisJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978