Consolidation, Fragmentation, and the Disclosure of Trading Information
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 8 (3) , 579-603
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/8.3.579
Abstract
It is commonly believed that fragmented security markets have a natural tendency to consolidate. This article examines this belief, focusing on the effect of disclosing trading information to market participants. We show that large traders who place multiple trades can benefit from the absence of trade disclosure in a fragmented market, as can dealers who face less price competition than in a unified market. Consequently, a fragmented market need not coalesce into a single market unless trade disclosure is mandatory. We also compare and contrast fragmented and consolidated markets. Fragmentation results in higher price volatility and violations of price efficiency.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- What's special about the specialist?Journal of Financial Economics, 1992
- Anonymity in securities marketsJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1992
- Time and the Process of Security Price AdjustmentThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Dual Trading in Futures MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of CapitalThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- Multimarket Trading and Market LiquidityThe Review of Financial Studies, 1991
- Sunshine Trading and Financial Market EquilibriumThe Review of Financial Studies, 1991
- A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price VariabilityThe Review of Financial Studies, 1988
- Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed tradersJournal of Financial Economics, 1985
- Dealership marketJournal of Financial Economics, 1980