Monitoring of Median Nerve Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Carotid Surgery
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Clinical Neurophysiology
- Vol. 15 (5) , 429-438
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199809000-00007
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare median somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with routine shunting and nonshunting (excluding the option of selective shunting) and to evaluate the significance of a decrease in the amplitude of the cortically generated waveforms of the SEP and/or an increase in the central conduction time (CCT) on the one hand, and that of a loss of the cortical SEP, on the other. Somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded in 32 patients before, during, and after CEA with routine shunting or nonshunting. The N13 and N20 latency, the CCT, and the N20/P25 amplitude were evaluated. In addition, a meta-analysis of 15 previous studies was performed comprising a total of 3,136 patients. The intraoperative cortical SEP showed no differences between shunted and nonshunted patients, apart from the preclamping value of the N20/P25 amplitude which was lower in the nonshunted subjects. The number of patients with decreased and/or delayed cortical SEP (findings frequently used as criterion for selective shunting) was similar in the two study groups. A loss of the cortical SEP occurred in one patient operated on without an indwelling shunt. None of these patients had a new neurologic deficit after surgery. In the meta-analysis, the positive predictive value of decreased and/or delayed cortical SEP was extremely poor, that of absent cortical SEP was poor to moderate and the prevalence of new neurologic deficits was similar in patients undergoing CEA with routine shunting-nonshunting and those with selective shunting-nonshunting. Our study suggests that decreased and/or delayed cortical SEP are unreliable predictors of the neurological outcome of CEA patients and consequently an unsuitable criterion for selective shunting. The meta-analysis confirms this finding and shows that the neurologic outcome is not improved by using an indwelling shunt selectively based on SEP monitoring.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Near-infrared monitoring of cerebral oxygenation state during carotid endarterectomySurgical Neurology, 1996
- Electrophysiological Monitoring for Selective Shunting During Carotid EndarterectomyJournal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 1995
- Intraoperative recording of parietal SEP can miss hemodynamic infarction during carotid endarterectomy: a case studyElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1994
- Risks and benefits of shunting in carotid endarterectomy. The International Transcranial Doppler Collaborators.Stroke, 1992
- Role of SEP in identifying patients requiring temporary shunt during carotid endarterectomyElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1992
- Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgeryNeurology, 1992
- Monitoring Electrophysiologic Function during Carotid EndarterectomyAnesthesiology, 1991
- MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosisThe Lancet, 1991
- Monitoring of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Carotid Surgery: Results, Usefulness and Limitations of the MethodAnnals of Vascular Surgery, 1988
- Monitoring of subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levelsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1987