The radiologic detection of duodenal ulcers: effects of examiner variability, ulcer size and location, and technique
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 145 (3) , 551-553
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.145.3.551
Abstract
Study of 91 endoscopically verified duodenal ulcers compared the effects of examiner variability, ulcer size and location, and radiographic technique on ulcer detection. Radiologic sensitivity of 61.5% was found for the entire group of 91 ulcers. Examiner variability was the strongest determinant of success; sensitivities for individual examiners ranged from 44.4% to 80%. Ulcer size was a second factor in radiologic detectability; ulcers 5 mm or larger were detected at a higher rate (80.0%) than those less than 5 mm (64.5%). Sensitivities of 65.9% and 57.4% were recorded for single- and double-contrast examinations, respectively, a statistically insignificant difference.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of gastritis by single- and double-contrast radiography.Radiology, 1983
- The role of single and double-contrast radiography in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis.Radiology, 1983
- The sensitivity of radiography of the postoperative stomach.Radiology, 1982
- Detection of gastric ulcer: comparison of single- and double-contrast examinationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Sensitivity of single- vs. double-contrast radiology in erosive gastritisAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perceptionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981
- Single- and double-contrast techniques in esophagitisAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980