Phase II to III Study Comparing Doxorubicin and Docetaxel With Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Dutch Community Setting Trial for the Clinical Trial Group of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (28) , 7081-7088
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.06.236
Abstract
Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Patients (n = 216) were randomly assigned to either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2) or FAC (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2); both regimens were administered on day 1, every 3 weeks. Results A median number of six cycles was delivered in both arms, with a median relative dose-intensity of more than 98%. Median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly longer for patients on AT compared with FAC (TTP: 8.0 v 6.6 months, respectively; P = .004; and OS: 22.6 v 16.2 months, respectively; P = .019). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in patients on AT compared with FAC (58% v 37%, respectively; P = .003). The ORR on AT was also higher in patients with visceral disease compared with FAC patients with visceral disease (59% v 36%, respectively; P = .003). There were no differences in grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and infections (AT 89% v FAC 84% and AT 12% v FAC 9%, respectively). Neutropenic fever was more common in AT-treated patients than FAC-treated patients (33% v 9%, respectively; P < .001). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent in both arms. Congestive heart failure was observed in 3% and 6% of patients on AT and FAC, respectively. Conclusion In this phase II to III study, AT resulted in a significantly longer TTP and OS and a higher objective ORR than FAC. First-line AT is a valid treatment option for patients with MBC.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Docetaxel and Doxorubicin Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Are Anthracycline-Taxane Regimens the New Standard of Care in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Combination of taxanes and anthracyclines in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: an interim reportEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Versus Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Multicenter TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- A Systematic Overview of Chemotherapy Effects in Breast CancerActa Oncologica, 2001
- Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Dose-finding study of docetaxel and doxorubicin in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancerPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Cytotoxic and hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of published randomized trials involving 31,510 women.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- A multicentre phase II study of the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: Report of the Clinical Screening Group of the EORTCAnnals of Oncology, 1996