A POSITIVE THEORY OF DISCRETIONARY POLICY, THE COST OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT AND THE BENEFITS OF A CONSTITUTION
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 24 (3) , 367-388
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1986.tb01817.x
Abstract
We offer an explanation of government's preference for discretionary policy action. The main elements are asymmetric information and the ability and desire of governments to maximize reelection prospects. Discretionary policy imposes a social cost. We show that the cost is eliminated if all voters have the same information as the government. An optimal, state contingent policy rule that precommits government through a constitution eliminates the cost by removing government's opportunities to exploit its informational advantage. Rules of this kind, and constitutional restrictions, are difficult to enforce in the presence of uncertainty and different information available to government and the public.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Cyclical InvestmentThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- Limit Pricing and Entry under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium AnalysisEconometrica, 1982
- Inflation, Unemployment, and Public Opinion PollsJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1982
- A Rational Theory of the Size of GovernmentJournal of Political Economy, 1981
- The Effects of Uncertainty on Investment under Risk Neutrality with Endogenous InformationJournal of Political Economy, 1980
- An Empirical Study of Politico-Economic Interaction in the United StatesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1978
- Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal PlansJournal of Political Economy, 1977
- An Equilibrium Model of the Business CycleJournal of Political Economy, 1975
- The Effects of Economic Policies on Votes for the Presidency: Some Evidence from Recent ElectionsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1975
- The Political Business CycleThe Review of Economic Studies, 1975