Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty The effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 13 (7) , 748-752
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90025-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- An in vivo determination of patellofemoral contact positionsClinical Biomechanics, 2000
- Rollback in posterior cruciate ligament—retaining total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1997
- In Vivo Knee Kinematics Derived Using an Inverse Perspective TechniqueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1995
- Patient Outcomes Following Tricompartmental Total Knee ReplacementJAMA, 1994
- Kinematics of successful knee prostheses during weight-bearing: Three-dimensional movements and positions of screw axes in the Tricon-M and Miller-Galante designsKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1994
- Functional Analysis of Pre and Post-Knee Surgery: Total Knee Arthroplasty and ACL ReconstructionJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1993
- The Effects of Implant Design on Range of Motion After Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1992
- Abnormal kinematics of the artificial knee: Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of 10 Miller-Galante and five New Jersey LCS kneesActa Orthopaedica, 1991
- The orientation of the distal part of the quadriceps femoris muscle as a function of the knee flexion-extension angleJournal of Biomechanics, 1985