Prehension in the pigeon

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Eating in the pigeon involves a series of jaw movements some of which serve a prehensile function; i.e., they are utilized in the grasping and manipulation of objects. These prehensile behaviors are extremely brief (30–80 ms), produce an adjustment of jaw opening amplitude to the size of the food object, are mediated by an effector system involving a relatively small number of muscles and are amenable to both “reflexive” and “voluntary” control. This combination of structural simplicity and functional complexity suggests that the pigeon's jaw movements may provide a useful “model system” for the study of motor control mechanisms in targeted movements. The present report provides a classification of jaw opening movements occurring during eating and a preliminary determination of the extent to which each movement class is scaled to the size of the food object. Jaw movements were monitored during responses to spherical food pellets of six different sizes (3.2–11.1 mm in diameter) using a transducing system which produces a continuous record of gape (i.e., interbeak distance). Assignment to movement classes was then carried out using a computer-assisted scoring program. Functions relating jaw opening amplitude to target size were determined for each movement class. Four jaw movement classes were identified: Prepecks (just prior to pecking), Grasps (opening movements made during pecking but prior to contact with the target), Mandibulations (movements serving to position and transport the object within the buccal cavity) and Swallows. For two of these movement classes (Grasps, Mandibulations) jaw opening amplitude is scaled to pellet size but the scaling functions differ in ways that reflect the functional requirements of the two behaviors. However, for both movements, the data suggest that information about initial gape is used to control opening amplitude. It is concluded that during Grasping, the adjustment of opening amplitude to stimulus size involves visual inputs and “open-loop” control mechanisms, while for Mandibulation, that adjustment involves tactile input and “closed-loop” mechanisms.