Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- Vol. 105 (6) , 555-62
Abstract
Abortion rates rose following the expanded legalization of abortion by the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade. As a result, the impact of the restriction on Federal funding of abortions under the Hyde Amendment in 1977 was not clear. However, abortion rates had plateaued by 1985, when State funding of Medicaid abortions was restricted in Colorado, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. Analysis of statewide data from the three States indicated that following restrictions on State funding of abortions, the proportion of reported pregnancies resulting in births, rather than in abortions, increased in all three States. In 1985, the first year of State restrictions on the use of public funds for abortion, Colorado, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania recorded 1.9 to 2.4 percent increases in the proportion of reported pregnancies resulting in live births, after years of declining rates. With adjustments for underreporting of abortion, there was an overall 1.2 percent rise in the proportion of pregnancies resulting in live births in those States. Nationally the proportion rose only 0.4 percent. By 1987, the three States had experienced increases above 1984 levels of 1.6 to 5.9 percent in the proportion of reported pregnancies resulting in live births. The experiences of the three States can be used in projecting an expected increase in the proportions of reported pregnancies resulting in live births, rather than in abortions, for similar States. A projection for California, for example, showed that an increase could be expected in the first year of restrictions on the use of public funds for abortion of at least 4,000 births, which could be expected largely to affect women of low income.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Benefits and Costs of Government Funding for AbortionFamily Planning Perspectives, 1986
- The Hyde Amendment in action. How did the restriction of federal funds for abortion affect low-income women?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1981
- The Impact of Restricting Medicaid Financing for AbortionFamily Planning Perspectives, 1980
- After the Hyde Amendment: Public Funding for Abortion in FY 1978Family Planning Perspectives, 1980
- Response of low income women and abortion facilities to restriction of public funds for abortion: a study of a large metropolitan area.American Journal of Public Health, 1979
- The health impact of restricting public funds for abortion. October 10, 1977--June 10, 1978.American Journal of Public Health, 1979