Recognition molecules and neural repair
- 11 December 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Neurochemistry
- Vol. 101 (4) , 865-882
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04409.x
Abstract
Neural recognition molecules were discovered and characterized initially for their functional roles in cell adhesion as regulators of affinity between cells and the extracellular matrix in vitro. They were then recognized as mediators or co-receptors which trigger signal transduction mechanisms affecting cell adhesion and de-adhesion. Their involvement in contact attraction and repulsion relies on cell-intrinsic properties that are modulated by the spatial contexts of their expression at particular stages of ontogenetic development, in synaptic plasticity and during regeneration after injury. The functional roles of recognition molecules in cell proliferation and migration, determination of developmental fate, growth cone guidance, and synapse formation, stabilization and modulation have been well documented not only by in vitro, but also by in vivo studies that have been greatly aided by generation of genetically altered mice. More recently, the functions of recognition molecules have been investigated under conditions of neural repair and manipulated using a broad range of genetic and pharmacological approaches to achieve a beneficial outcome. The principal aim of most therapeutically oriented approaches has been to neutralize inhibitory factors. However, less attention has been paid to enhancing repair by stimulating the stimulatory factors. When considering potential therapeutic strategies, it is worth considering that a single recognition molecule can possess domains that are conducive or repellent and that the spatial distribution of recognition molecules can determine the overall function: Recognition molecules may be repellent for neurite outgrowth when presented as barriers or steep-concentration gradients and conducive when presented as uniform substrates. The focus of this review will be on the more recent attempts to study the conducive mechanisms with the expectation that they may be able to tip the balance from a regeneration inhospitable to a hospitable environment. It is likely that a combination of the two principles, as multifactorial as each principle may be in itself, will be of therapeutic value in humans.Keywords
This publication has 190 references indexed in Scilit:
- Glial inhibition of CNS axon regenerationNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2006
- A role for axon guidance receptors and ligands in blood vessel development and tumor angiogenesisCytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 2005
- IntegrinsCell, 2002
- Mechanisms and functions of eph and ephrin signallingNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2002
- The Neural Recognition Molecule L1 Is a Sialic Acid-binding Lectin for CD24, Which Induces Promotion and Inhibition of Neurite OutgrowthJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
- Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) Encodes a Netrin ReceptorCell, 1996
- The extracellular matrix molecule tenascin-C: Expression in vivo and functional characterization in vitroProgress in Neurobiology, 1996
- Casein Kinase II Phosphorylates the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Journal of Neurochemistry, 1996
- Enhanced expression of the extracellular matrix molecule J1/tenascin in the regenerating adult mouse sciatic nerveJournal of Neurocytology, 1990
- Structure of a glycolipid reacting with monoclonal IgM in neuropathy and with HNK-1Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1985