Patency Following Microsurgical Vasoepididymostomy and Vasovasostomy: Temporal Considerations
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 154 (6) , 2070-2073
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66697-7
Abstract
We evaluate the temporal parameters of patency following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy. A series of consecutive and concurrent vasoepididymostomies (100) and vasovasostomies (100) performed by a single surgeon (M. G.) was reviewed. Patency rates following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy were 65% and 99%, respectively (p < 0.001). Motile sperm were observed at a mean of 5.8 +/- 0.8 months (standard error) following vasoepididymostomy and 2.1 +/- 0.2 months following vasovasostomy (p < 0.01). Late failure rates were 21% for vasoepididymostomy and 12% for vasovasostomy. Pregnancy rates following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy were 21% and 52%, respectively. Patency is rapid following vasovasostomy but requires 12 or more months following vasoepididymostomy. Intervention for azoospermia is appropriate 6 months after vasovasostomy and 1 year after vasoepididymostomy. Intraoperative cryopreservation of sperm in men undergoing vasoepididymostomy and postoperatively in all men with motile sperm will maximize fertility options.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed Appearance of Sperm After End-to-Side VasoepididymostomyJournal of Urology, 1995
- Microsurgical Vasoepididymostomy: Refinements and ResultsJournal of Urology, 1993
- Results of 1,469 Microsurgical Vasectomy Reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study GroupJournal of Urology, 1991
- A Modified Vasoepididymostomy Performed with the Sling and Blanket TechniqueJournal of Urology, 1990
- Role of epididymis in sperm maturationUrology, 1989
- A 20-year experience with epididymovasostomy for pathologic epididymal obstructionFertility and Sterility, 1987
- A 20-Year Experience with VasovasostomyJournal of Urology, 1986
- Transient Fertility after Vasovasostomy in 892 PatientsJournal of Urology, 1985