Multivariate Comparison of Howes' and Weisenburg and Mc Bride's Models of Aphasia on the Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination
- 1 December 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 43 (3) , 795-806
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1976.43.3.795
Abstract
The verbal production of 57 aphasic patients was rated and used to assign these patients into two sets of groups reflecting Howes' and Weisenburg and McBride's models of aphasia. Test scores covering a broad range of communication skills and modalities were compared between these groups to examine the assumption that salient features of verbal production could be used to establish groups which would show significant differences on other important linguistic variables. Neither Howes' nor Weisenburg and McBride's model provided groups showing significant multivariate differences. It was suggested that these models be improved by expanding them to include other important psycholinguistic components of language skills. Since these models did not account for significant between group differences, caution was suggested in using these models for assessment or treatment purposes.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The spreen-benton aphasia tests, normative data as a measure of normal language developmentBrain and Language, 1975
- Component Analysis of Within Correlations of Language-Skill Tests in Normal ChildrenThe Journal of Special Education, 1974
- Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance procedures.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Fluency in Aphasia: Correlation with Radioactive Scan LocalizationCortex, 1967
- Problems of Test Construction in the Field of AphasiaCortex, 1967
- Phrase Length and the Type and Severity of AphasiaCortex, 1964
- A Factor Analysis of the Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of AphasiaJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1962