Flexibility, Casualization and Externalization in the New Zealand workforce
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Industrial Relations
- Vol. 36 (4) , 491-518
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002218569403600403
Abstract
The New Zealand Employment Contracts Act was introduced in 1991 to make the labour market more flexible. However, it is far from clear that the New Zealand labour market was inflexible. This paper represents the results of a survey of employers which was conducted when the Employment Contracts Act was conting into effect. The paper finds that the labour market was not inflexible and that employers had been able to successfully casualize and externalize labour under the pre-existirzg legal environment. The study finds further that the employer pursuit of flexibility was not part of an unrelenting drive to achieve new forms of work but was, in general, an opportunistic reaction to recession. Furthermore, employers anticipate that growth in employment, when it comes, will be in perma nent full-time jobs rather than in casual or externalized employment.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Labour Law and the New Labour ForcePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2015
- The new labour law of the Russian FederationInternational Labour Review, 2005
- Collective Bargaining and New Zealand's Employment Contracts Act: One Year OnJournal of Industrial Relations, 1993
- Core and Periphery in Employers' Workforce Strategies: Evidence from the 1987 E.L.U.S. SurveyWork, Employment & Society, 1990
- The `Flexible Firm': Fixation or Fact?Work, Employment & Society, 1988
- The Flexibility Debate: Part Time WorkLabour and Industry, 1988
- Human Resource Flexibility — Some Necessary Conditions for SuccessPersonnel Review, 1987
- HomeworkingPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Perspectives on Lobor Market FlexibilityIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1986
- The Temporary Help Industry: A Response to the Dual Internal Labor MarketILR Review, 1985