Clinical audit: obstetric performance after caesarean section
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 23 (5) , 503-506
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0144361031000153729
Abstract
The RCOG Clinical Audit Unit has defined two auditable standards in women labouring with a previous caesarean section (LSCS). We found documentation of a discussion in 98% of patient notes on issues relating to delivery, including a trial of vaginal delivery. Excluding patients declining a trial of vaginal delivery, the successful vaginal delivery rate was 36/60 (60%). One in three patients, although suitable, declined a trial of vaginal delivery. This request was invariably made at the booking consultation. Two in three patients required a repeat LSCS for delivery. Women were twice and 2.4 times as likely to have a repeat LSCS delivery when their primary LSCS was for fetal distress and failure to progress, respectively. There was one (1%) case of confirmed scar rupture and one stillbirth of unknown aetiology at 34/40. Recommendations include vigilance and senior supervision at primigravid labours and confident recommendation of trial of vaginal delivery by obstetrics team.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scottish female obstetricians' views on elective caesarean section and personal choice for deliveryJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2002
- Vaginal delivery after caesarean section triples risk of uterine ruptureBMJ, 2001
- Women's role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean sectionThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1999
- Controversies in management: Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed Maternal choice alone should not determine method of deliveryBMJ, 1998
- Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of deliveryThe Lancet, 1996
- Vaginal Birth After Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1990