Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Political Analysis
- Vol. 3 (1) , 51-87
- https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/3.1.51
Abstract
This article compares a variety of models of presidential approval in terms of their dynamic properties and their theoretical underpinnings. Exponential distributed lags, partial adjustment, error correction, and transfer function models are considered. The major difference between the models lies in interpretation rather than statistical properties. The error correction model seems most satisfactory. Approval models based on individual level theories are examined, and found to give no additional purchase.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- MacropartisanshipAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- Vector Autoregression and the Study of PoliticsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- Systematic Sampling, Temporal Aggregation, and the Study of Political RelationshipsPolitical Analysis, 1989
- Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and TestingEconometrica, 1987
- Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential PopularityAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1983
- Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative HypothesesEconometrica, 1981
- Some Tests of Dynamic Specification for a Single EquationEconometrica, 1980
- Explaining Presidential Popularity: How Ad Hoc Theorizing, Misplaced Emphasis, and Insufficient Care in Measuring One's Variables Refuted Common Sense and Led Conventional Wisdom Down the Path of AnomaliesAmerican Political Science Review, 1978
- Time Series Modelling and InterpretationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1976
- Presidential Popularity from Truman to JohnsonAmerican Political Science Review, 1970