After Helsinki: Unresolved Issues in International Research
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
- Vol. 11 (1) , 17-36
- https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2001.0005
Abstract
Following a long process of revision, a new version of the Declaration of Helsinki was approved by the World Medical Association in 2000. Two provisions of the Declaration address ongoing international controversies regarding research sponsored by industrialized countries and conducted in developing countries. Despite the issuance of the final version of the Declaration, opponents remain locked in debate. Moreover, the Declaration remained silent on other prominent controversies concerning international research. An analysis of these current controversies reveals reasons why they are not likely to be readily resolved, despite apparent agreement by opponents on overarching ethical principles.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Ambiguity and the Exigency: Clarifying 'Standard of Care' Arguments in International ResearchJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2000
- The Need to Revise the Declaration of HelsinkiNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Proposed Revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki — Will They Weaken the Ethical Principles Underlying Human Research?New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Science in the Service of HealingHastings Center Report, 1998
- Research in Developing Countries: Taking "Benefit" SeriouslyHastings Center Report, 1998
- Placebos and HIV Lessons LearnedHastings Center Report, 1998
- AZT Trials and TribulationsHastings Center Report, 1998
- Is Ethical Research Feasible in Developed and Developing Countries?Bioethics, 1998
- Human rights and maternal-fetal HIV transmission prevention trials in Africa.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- The Ethics of Clinical Research in the Third WorldNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997