Allometry of Anaerobic Performance: A Gender Comparison
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 21 (1) , 48-62
- https://doi.org/10.1139/h96-005
Abstract
Physiological variables must often be scaled for body size differences to permit meaningful comparisons between groups. Using multivariate allometric scaling (MAS), this study aimed to compare the anaerobic performance of adult males and females in 12 pairs matched for physical activity status. Peak power output (PPO) was assessed via a 30-s supramaximal cycle ergometer test. Fat-free mass (FFM) and thigh muscle and bone cross-sectional area (CSA) were determined anthropometrically and served as indicators of active musculature. The MAS revealed power functions of the form PPO = a∙genderc∙FFMb (or CSAb). Common b exponents of 0.1 were identified for both FFM and CSA (negative allometry). Sex differences were found in absolute PPO (1,252 vs. 681 W, p <.05). Comparison of scaled PPO data via ANCOVA (FFM0.1 and CSA0.1 entered as cavariates) did not eliminate the sex difference (adjusted means 1,243 vs. 690 W, p <.05). The results suggest that the superior anaerobic performance of males in this sample is independent of size of the involved musculature. Key words: allometric scaling, sex differences, peak power output, anthropometry.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of external Ca2+ and K+ in gating of cardiac delayed rectifier K+ currentsPflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 1992
- Performance During the Wingate Anaerobic Test and Muscle Morphology in Males and FemalesInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1987
- Accuracy of an Anthropometric Estimate of the Muscle and Bone Area in a Transversal Cross-Section of the ArmInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1986
- Measurement of work and power output using friction-loaded cycle ergometersErgonomics, 1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- ANAEROBIC POWER OF PROFESSIONAL BALLET DANCERSMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1984
- Lactate in human skeletal muscle after 10 and 30 s of supramaximal exerciseJournal of Applied Physiology, 1983
- A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studiesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982
- The orderly recruitment of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractionsThe Journal of Physiology, 1973
- ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENYBiological Reviews, 1966